Inconsistently Admirable Wiki:Rules

As a wiki, rules are necessary to make sure that people don't disrupt the wiki or others.

General Rules

1. No Harassment: Harassment will not be tolerated in this wiki. Incidents will result in a block and repeated incidents will result in a long block, potentially indefinite if such behavior is a pattern.
2. Avoid Edit Warring: Edit warring is the act of repeatedly making edits to undo other edits and will result in a block.
3. No Vandalism: Do not vandalize our wiki. Examples include deleting large portions of an article's text without permission or changing an article's categories just to get a character approved/disapproved here. It will result in a long (possibly indefinite) block.
4. No Plagiarism: Do not plagiarize other articles. Make writing in your own words and cite sources when appropriate. Plagiarizing will result in a block.
5. Avoid Stubs: Try to avoid creating stub pages. Creating a stub page will result in a warning, and if such behavior is extreme (spamming multiple stub pages at once) or continuous (habit of making stub pages) will result in a block.
6. Do not Spam Edits: Do not spam minor edits, such as spelling mistakes or adding one category per edit. This will result in a warning or block depending on severity and history of edit spams.
7. Do not Spread Misinformation: Accidents happen, and we are happy to inform other users about information that they do not know about. However, intentionally saying false information, especially related to potentially life-or-death topics like healthcare, will result in a block.

Proposal Rules

1. Make Proposals of Decent Quality: We're not expecting a super-in-depth novel here, but proposals missing entire sections or with very basic information that doesn't provide users enough information to vote will be deleted on the spot. Repeated creation of poor-quality proposals will result in a block.
2. Do not Propose Characters that are not Remotely Close to Criteria: Characters that are so far away from the criteria that it is immediately obvious that the character is either not admirable enough or too consistent in heroism will result in the proposal being rejected and the user being warned/blocked. Obviously, there will be characters that don't qualify that people will propose, and people shouldn't feel afraid of proposing potentially controversial candidates, so try to assume benefit of the doubt. However, if it's something blatant like a mere stop the villains hero or a hero that has only one tiny PG disqualifying factor not related to admirability, or if it's something that has been explained to the user before but they refused to listen to, then reject the proposal and warn the user. Continuing to propose characters blatantly far away from the criteria will result in a block.
3. Votes must Have Proper Reasoning: When voting, users must give a proper reason for their vote. They cannot utilize severe misinformation either. Otherwise, the vote will be invalid. If the vote is close to being valid, then calmly explain to the user what they are missing before declaring the vote invalid.
4. Cannot Change Invalid Votes: Votes that are marked invalid cannot be changed afterwards.
5. Removing Approved Characters/Proposing Rejected Characters: Removals for approved characters or proposals for rejected characters must get the approval of an admin beforehand. There must have been at minimum 2 weeks since the previous verdict on the character for a removal or reproposal to be given.
6. Proposal Limit: To prevent people from spamming proposals, there is a limit of 3 proposals per user per week.
7. No Spoilers: Users must wait at least 2 weeks after a work is released to make proposals of characters from it.